East Europe as a proto-homeland of the Indo-Europeans

Editor Алексей Германович Виноградов

Illustrator Алексей Германович Виноградов

Translator Алексей Германович Виноградов

© A. G. Vinogradov, 2025

© S. V. Zharnikova, 2025

© Алексей Германович Виноградов, illustrations, 2025

© Алексей Германович Виноградов, translation, 2025

ISBN 978-5-0065-5092-6

Created with Ridero smart publishing system

Introduction

In the modern world, the urgency of the problems of the ethnic history of the peoples of various regions of our planet is obvious. The growth of ethnic self-awareness, which has been observed everywhere in recent decades, is accompanied by an increase in interest in the historical past of peoples, in the transformations that each of them experienced in the course of its millennia-old formation. It became a spiritual need for a representative of a modern urbanized society to find the roots of his ethnic existence, to understand the diverse processes that led to the formation of that ethnocultural environment through which he perceives the world around him.

Since the origin and historical existence of the overwhelming majority of the peoples of our planet was associated with numerous migrations, movements to new habitats, causing changes in a number of cultural factors both among the alien people and the indigenous population, today, studying the ethnic history and culture of their people, we, of course, study them in the process of historical transformations and mutual influences of many tribes and peoples, which to one degree or another took part in their formation. Regional ethno-historical research in our time is becoming especially acute, since it is knowledge of the history of one’s own people that helps a modern person to free himself from the narrowness of the nationalist view of the world, to understand the role and significance of the contribution to the common treasury of human culture of all peoples, to realize that humanity is one.

Of course, it is impossible to solve the most difficult issues of ethnic history today without involving data from the most diverse fields of science. It is necessary to combine the efforts of ethnographers, historians, archeologists, linguists, folklorists, anthropologists, art historians, as well as paleobotanists, paleozoologists, paleoclimatologists and geomorphologists, since the development and formation of peoples took place in certain climatic zones, in certain landscapes, with a certain flora and fauna, and this must be taken into account.

Viktor von Hen responded very interestingly in 1890 about Russian culture: «Russia is a country of eternal change and completely non-conservative, and a country of ultra-conservative customs, where historical times live, and does not 2 part with rituals and representations, no matter how related. The modern culture here is an external gloss, it develops in a wave-like fashion, generates disgusting phenomena; what the Ancient Tradition has preserved with regard to goods, customs, tools, etc., has been invented solidly, rationally, wisely and skillfully used… They are not a young people, but an old one – like the Chinese. All their mistakes are not youthful flaws, but arise from asthenic exhaustion. They are very old, ancient, conservatively preserved all the oldest and do not refuse it. By their language, their superstition, their disposition, etc. you can study the most ancient times.» (Victor Hen, biography. 1894)

Chapter 1 Localization of the Indo-European ancestral home

N. K. Roerich. Karelian landscape

Among the numerous options for the location of the most ancient Indo-European ancestral home already in the 19th century. O. Spiegel proposed the territory of Eastern Europe between 45 and 69° N It was he who first pointed out the obligatory presence of a mountainous landscape on the Indo-European ancestral homeland, noting the insignificant height of these mountains, since rye and wheat were sown on them, the names of which are in the Indo-European parent language.»

On the territory of Eastern Europe there are not so few elevations, especially in its northern part – Valdai, mountains of the Kola Peninsula and Karelia, Northern Uvals, mountain formations of the Arkhangelsk region, Komi, etc.

Returning to the idea of O. Spiegel that the Indo-European ancestral homeland was located in Eastern Europe between 45 and 69° N, we again repeat that it was here, in the era of the Holocene climatic optimum, identical to the end of the common Indo-European period, that there were mountain landscapes with insignificant heights, where there were excellent and optimal opportunities for growing rye, barley, oats, wheat – cereals, whose names are recorded in the common Indo-European parent language. N. D. Andreev relates the time of the appearance and beginning of the independent evolution of the Early Indo-European Proto-language to the time of transition from the Upper Paleolithic to the Mesolithic and the period of the Early Mesolithic, 10—8 thousand BC.

Already at this early stage in common Indo-European language there are terms denoting rye, grain, grain, flax, barley, wheat, winnow, etc. Archeology has data that suggest that the rudiments of agriculture appeared (in the form of gathering and processing cereals) even 30—40 millennia ago in the era of the Young Sheksna interstadial, as evidenced by the numerous finds of stone pesto sources in Eastern Europe. It can be assumed that the wild ancestors of cereals such as rye, barley, oats, wheat and the most ancient Indo-European fiber-flax, being plants of long daylight hours, should have been initially spread exactly where there were the most favorable conditions for their natural existence.

So, in spring, long daylight plants need at least 14—16 hours of light for germination, and at least 16—18 hours for growth and development. But here it is appropriate to recall that, starting from 7th etc. and until the middle of 1 thousand 4 BC the climate of Eastern Europe was much warmer than modern, and spring came in the north 30—40 days earlier. With such a shift, the southern border of the range of these plants was 58—64° N.

L. S. Berg also noted that long-daylight cereals need long-term sunlight for earning, and in the north and east they have «relatively more favorable conditions than in the south and west… In the north, the absence of overheating is positive for plants from direct rays of the sun and a significant amount of scattered light.» And the huge amount of scattered light received by the territories of the East European North is evidenced by the following data cited by L. S. Berg:" Here (at 68° N) ultraviolet rays, contribute to the formation of vitamin, almost twice as much as under the 47—54° N, the intensity of ultraviolet radiation is much greater than in the middle latitudes».

Once again, the Eastern European localization of the Indo-European ancestral home was proposed in the middle of our century by A. Scherer, who believed that the areas occupied by the Indo-Europeans should border the area of the Pra-Ugrians, and after the collapse of the Indo-European community, the territory of Eastern Europe for a long time remained the habitat of various Indo-European tribes: Germans, and the Italians occupied the north and northwest; Balto-Slavs-northeast, and protogreek – southeast.

And finally, many researchers, starting in the 19th century and up to now, it was considered possible to connect the common Indo-European ancestral homeland with Northern or Northeastern Europe on the basis of the continuous development of the anthropological type, the fact that a fair-haired and light-eyed population predominates here, because on the basis of the oldest Indo-European monument – the Rigveda, historical arias were light Hair and blue-eyed.